Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Clin Imaging ; 90: 63-70, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1936173

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (CVT), prior to the COVID pandemic, was rare representing 0.5 of all strokes, with the diagnosis made by MRI or CT venography.1-,3 COVID-19 patients compared to general populations have a 30-60 times greater risk of CVT compared to non-affected populations, and up to a third of severe COVID patients may have thrombotic complications.4-8 Currently, vaccines are the best way to prevent severe COVID-19. In February 2021, reports of CVT and Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) related to adenovirus viral vector vaccines including the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222 (ChAdOx1)) and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine (JNJ-78436735 (Ad26.COV2·S)), were noted, with a 1/583,000 incidence from Johnson and Johnson vaccine in the United States.11, 12 This study retrospectively analyzed CVT and cross-sectional venography at an Eastern Medical Center from 2018 to 2021, and presents radiographic examples of CVT and what is learned from the immune response. METHODS: After IRB approval, a retrospective review of cross-sectional CTV and MRVs from January 1st 2018 to April 30th 2021, at a single health system was performed. Indications, vaccine status, patient age, sex, and positive finding incidence were specifically assessed during March and April for each year. A multivariable-adjusted trends analysis using Poisson regression estimated venogram frequencies and multivariable logistic regression compared sex, age, indications and vaccination status. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: From January 1, 2018 to April 30, 2021, (Fig. 1), a total of n = 2206 in patient and emergency room cross-sectional venograms were obtained, with 322 CTVs and 1884 MRVs. In 2018, 2019, 2020, respective totals of cross-sectional venograms were 568, 657, 660, compared to 321 cross-sectional venograms in the first four months of 2021. CTV in 2018, 2019, 2020, respective totals were 51, 86, 97, MRV totals were 517, 571, 563, compared to the 2021 first four month totals of 88 CTVs and 233 MRVs. March, April 2018, 2019, 2020, CTVs respectively were 6, 17, 11, compared to the 2021 first four months of 59 CTVs, comprising 63% of the total 93 CTVs, respective MRVs were 79, 97, 52, compared to 143 MRVs in the first four months of 2021 for 39% of the total 371 MRVs. In March, April 2020 during the pandemic onset, cross-sectional imaging at the East Coast Medical Center decreased, as priorities were on maintaining patient ventilation, high level of care and limiting spread of disease. In March/April 2021, reports of VITT and CVT likely contributed to increased CTVs and MRVs, of 39.65% [1.20-1.63] increase (P < 0.001) from prior. In March, April 2021 of 202 venograms obtained, 158 (78.2.%) were unvaccinated patients, 16 positive for CVT (10.1%), 44 were on vaccinated patients (21.7%), 8 specifically ordered with vaccination as a clinical indication, 2 positive for CVT (4.5%), (odds ratio = 0.52 [0.12-2.38], p = 0.200). CONCLUSION: CTV prior to the COVID pandemic, was rare, responsible for 0.5 of all strokes, at the onset of the pandemic in the East Coast, overall cross-sectional imaging volumes declined due to maintaining ventilation, high levels of care and limiting disease spread, although COVID-19 patients have a 30-60 times greater risk of CVT compared to the general population, and vaccination is currently the best option to mitigate severe disease. In early 2021, reports of adenoviral vector COVID vaccines causing CTV and VITT, led to at 39.65% increase in cross-sectional venography, however, in this study unvaccinated patients in 2021 had higher incidence of CVT (10.1%), compared to the vaccinated patients (4.5%). Clinicians should be aware that VITT CVT may present with a headache 5-30 days post-vaccination with thrombosis best diagnosed on CTV or MRV. If thrombosis is present with thrombocytopenia, platelets <150 × 109, elevated D-Dimer >4000 FEU, and positive anti-PF4 ELISA assay, the diagnosis is definitive.13 VITT CVT resembles spontaneous autoimmune heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), and is postulated to occur from platelet factor 4 (PF4) binding to vaccine adenoviral vectors forming a novel antigen, anti-PF4 memory B-cells and anti-PF4 (VITT) antibodies.14-17.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Intracranial Thrombosis , Thrombocytopenia , Venous Thrombosis , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Humans , Immunity , Intracranial Thrombosis/chemically induced , Intracranial Thrombosis/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombocytopenia/immunology , Venous Thrombosis/chemically induced , Venous Thrombosis/immunology
2.
Scand J Immunol ; 94(5): e13097, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1388398

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 is a global pandemic with a daily increasing number of affected individuals. Thrombosis is a severe complication of COVID-19 that leads to a worse clinical course with higher rates of mortality. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that hyperinflammation plays a crucial role in disease progression. This review compiles clinical data of COVID-19 patients who developed thrombotic complications to investigate the possible role of hyperinflammation in inducing hypercoagulation. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus to identify relevant clinical studies that investigated thrombotic manifestations and reported inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers in COVID-19 patients. Only 54 studies met our inclusion criteria, the majority of which demonstrated significantly elevated inflammatory markers. In the cohort studies with control, D-dimer was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients with thrombosis as compared to the control. Pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis and strokes were frequently reported which could be attributed to the hyperinflammatory response associated with COVID-19 and/or to the direct viral activation of platelets and endothelial cells, two mechanisms that are discussed in this review. It is recommended that all admitted COVID-19 patients should be assessed for hypercoagulation. Furthermore, several studies have suggested that anticoagulation may be beneficial, especially in hospitalized non-ICU patients. Although vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been approved and distributed in several countries, research should continue in the field of prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and its severe complications including thrombosis due to the emergence of new variants against which the efficacy of the vaccines is not yet clear.


Subject(s)
Arteries/pathology , Blood Platelets/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Endothelium, Vascular/immunology , Inflammation/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Venous Thrombosis/immunology , Animals , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Platelets/virology , COVID-19/complications , Endothelium, Vascular/virology , Humans , Inflammation/complications , Phenotype , Thrombosis , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
4.
Nat Rev Immunol ; 21(5): 319-329, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171402

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a clinical syndrome caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Patients with severe disease show hyperactivation of the immune system, which can affect multiple organs besides the lungs. Here, we propose that SARS-CoV-2 infection induces a process known as immunothrombosis, in which activated neutrophils and monocytes interact with platelets and the coagulation cascade, leading to intravascular clot formation in small and larger vessels. Microthrombotic complications may contribute to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and other organ dysfunctions. Therapeutic strategies aimed at reducing immunothrombosis may therefore be useful. Several antithrombotic and immunomodulating drugs have been proposed as candidates to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The growing understanding of SARS-CoV-2 infection pathogenesis and how it contributes to critical illness and its complications may help to improve risk stratification and develop targeted therapies to reduce the acute and long-term consequences of this disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/pathology , Cytokine Release Syndrome/pathology , Venous Thrombosis/immunology , Venous Thrombosis/pathology , Blood Coagulation/immunology , Blood Platelets/immunology , Critical Illness/therapy , Cytokine Release Syndrome/immunology , Endothelium, Vascular/pathology , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Lung/blood supply , Lung/pathology , Lung/virology , Monocytes/immunology , Neutrophils/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
5.
Cir Cir ; 88(6): 787-793, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1011872

ABSTRACT

Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the development of all manifestations of COVID-19, predisposes to arterial and venous thromboembolic disease. The coagulation system can be activated by various viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Vascular endothelial damage, added to the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation, affects the prognosis and mortality from this disease. Treatment is aimed at the prevention, early detection and timely interventions of all coagulation disorders generated by COVID-19. The recommended anticoagulant is low molecular weight heparin, taking into account creatinine clearance, and if major invasive procedures will be performed, unfractionated heparin is a safe option.


La infección por el virus SARS-CoV-2 y el desarrollo de todas las manifestaciones de COVID-19 predisponen a la enfermedad tromboembólica arterial y venosa. El sistema de coagulación puede ser activado por diversos virus, entre ellos el SARS-CoV-2. El daño endotelial vascular, sumado al desarrollo de coagulación intravascular diseminada, afecta el pronóstico y la mortalidad de esta enfermedad. El tratamiento está dirigido a la prevención, la detección temprana y las intervenciones oportunas de todas las alteraciones de la coagulación generadas por la COVID-19. El anticoagulante recomendado es la heparina de bajo peso molecular, tomando en cuenta el aclaramiento de creatinina, y si se realizarán procedimientos invasivos mayores, la heparina no fraccionada es una opción segura.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Disorders/etiology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/immunology , Blood Coagulation Disorders/prevention & control , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Endothelium, Vascular , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Thromboembolism/immunology , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Venous Thrombosis/immunology , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control
6.
Sci Transl Med ; 12(570)2020 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901250

ABSTRACT

Patients with COVID-19 are at high risk for thrombotic arterial and venous occlusions. Lung histopathology often reveals fibrin-based blockages in the small blood vessels of patients who succumb to the disease. Antiphospholipid syndrome is an acquired and potentially life-threatening thrombophilia in which patients develop pathogenic autoantibodies targeting phospholipids and phospholipid-binding proteins (aPL antibodies). Case series have recently detected aPL antibodies in patients with COVID-19. Here, we measured eight types of aPL antibodies in serum samples from 172 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. These aPL antibodies included anticardiolipin IgG, IgM, and IgA; anti-ß2 glycoprotein I IgG, IgM, and IgA; and anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) IgG and IgM. We detected aPS/PT IgG in 24% of serum samples, anticardiolipin IgM in 23% of samples, and aPS/PT IgM in 18% of samples. Antiphospholipid autoantibodies were present in 52% of serum samples using the manufacturer's threshold and in 30% using a more stringent cutoff (≥40 ELISA-specific units). Higher titers of aPL antibodies were associated with neutrophil hyperactivity, including the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), higher platelet counts, more severe respiratory disease, and lower clinical estimated glomerular filtration rate. Similar to IgG from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, IgG fractions isolated from patients with COVID-19 promoted NET release from neutrophils isolated from healthy individuals. Furthermore, injection of IgG purified from COVID-19 patient serum into mice accelerated venous thrombosis in two mouse models. These findings suggest that half of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 become at least transiently positive for aPL antibodies and that these autoantibodies are potentially pathogenic.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Venous Thrombosis/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/administration & dosage , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/blood , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/etiology , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/immunology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/complications , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Models, Animal , Extracellular Traps/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/administration & dosage , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/immunology , Neutrophils/metabolism , Thrombophilia/blood , Thrombophilia/etiology , Thrombophilia/immunology , Translational Research, Biomedical , Venous Thrombosis/blood , Venous Thrombosis/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL